Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Facundo Mena Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carabelli vs Mena analysis and find out who is favored!
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Facundo Mena Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Carabelli 2 - 4 Mena
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carabelli has won 48.68% of points on their second serve, while Mena has won 51.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carabelli, in recent form, has won 55.65% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mena has won 55.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.93% and 40.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carabelli has saved 60.96% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mena has saved 59.35% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carabelli has won 67.12% of matches played (W/L 49/ 24), with Mena winning 68.92% (W/L 51/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 287/ 159), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Mena has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Carabelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 74.14% of matches (W/L 43/ 15), where as Mena has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 78.95% of matches (W/L 30/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Carabelli winning 2 times and Mena being victorious 4 times. They have played 13 sets in total, with Carabelli winning 5 and Mena winning 8. The last match between Carabelli and Mena was at the Santa Cruz de la Sierra Challenger, 13-09-2023, Second, Clay with Facundo Mena getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:58.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Carabelli and Mena have played a deciding set 1 times, with Carabelli winning 0 times and Mena 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Carabelli winning 2, and Mena 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carabelli has played against opponents with an average rank of 280.96 while Mena has played against players with an average rank of 269.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carabelli has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mena has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carabelli has converted 46.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mena has converted 53.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
110
Rank
96
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total4
0
Hard0
2
Clay4
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
333
Rank
127
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
63% (316-184)
Career Total W/L
57% (466-354)
66% (27-14)
YTD W/L
67% (24-12)
$130,440
Career Prize Money
$140,110
2
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Facundo Mena |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 4 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 8 |
| Games Won | 62 | 70 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 14 |
| DFs (Total) | 17 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:58 | 1:44:58 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (270/428) | 55% (238/434) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (169/270) | 64% (153/238) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (81/158) | 55% (107/196) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 35% (16/46) | 46% (22/48) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (174/434) | 42% (178/428) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (2/6) | 67% (4/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Facundo Mena
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
46%
(
38 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Facundo Mena
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Facundo Mena
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 6-3 6-7(6) 6-1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
103)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
44%
(
20 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| 6-4 7-6(6) |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
37%
(
14 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
47%
(
37 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Facundo Mena |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 66% (27/14) | 67% (24/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (56/37) | 65% (51/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (493/425) | 58% (407/294) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 66% (25/13) | 66% (21/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.42 |
| Aces Total | 95 | 144 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 85 | 67 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:37:22 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 237.41 | 333.78 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1864/2965) | 55% (1147/2099) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1257/1864) | 72% (823/1147) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (536/1101) | 51% (486/952) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (150/321) | 55% (138/249) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1264/2994) | 45% (1005/2218) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 78% (21/6) | 58% (11/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 76% (13/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (25/39) | 67% (24/36) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (10/20) | 27% (3/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (8/11) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (23/23) | 95% (22/21) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (23/0) | 5% (22/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 22% (18/4) | 21% (14/3) |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
30 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Orlando Luz
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
87
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Facundo Mena Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Facundo Mena
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Facundo Mena
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
44%
(
29 of
66)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
47%
(
28 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Karue Sell
54%
(
59 of
110)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
59%
(
30 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
111
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Kaichi Uchida
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Leonardo Aboian
54%
(
37 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Facundo Mena
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
77
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 0-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
37%
(
25 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Daniel Antonio Nunez
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Fermin Tenti
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
6
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Thomas Brown
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Carabelli Vs Mena Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
